The study discussed in the passage was based on proving that the removal of alcohol from red wine would yield greater results. Neither choice a or b was implied at any point in the passage. Choices d and e were both stated at one point, but could not be concluded as the main idea as they weren’t discussed enough to qualify as main ideas.

The offered data supports the conclusion of the study, unlike choice a, which states that data is being introduced. This is incorrect because the study has already been described and therefore isn’t being introduced. Choice b is incorrect because there isn’t a counterpoint. Choice c is incorrect because there aren’t any outside sources being accessed. The paragraph produces facts from a study, not opinions, making choice e incorrect.

Lactose-free milk will have started out as whole milk before the lactose was removed from it, just like nonalcoholic red wine would have alcohol in it until removed. A Labradoodle is genetically engineered from a Labrador retriever’s DNA, but the dog can’t be a Labrador first and then a Labradoodle. Granny Smith and Fuji apples are two different kinds, but they are never the same product. A gas oven and a microwave are just two different kinds of ovens, not at all the same relationship, and the same goes for the Big Wheel and a bicycle.